The teachers did a good job presenting the lesson but like everyone else in the class, there are
parts that need to be worked on. The teachers asked for what cause and effect is and the
students had to reply. Then described with examples. Asked what they already know about climate change. The teachers should have done expectations of the students beforehand. Next time visuals of each, in the beginning, would be nice, I like that you are using the board as something different but wasn't a fan of the use of the whiteboard. The students had to come up with 4-6 facts they knew about global warming. Wasn't sure if this was the development of not, was unclear. My suggestion is the group should have taught about global warming: explain, demonstrate, modeling and checking for understanding. The use of a whiteboard wasted some time and hard for students to read could have typed in while asking the questions. The students should of filled out the google forums, but I do understand that it was done this way to save time but could have done a different activity for this. you did this to not waste time. Kahoot was used as a guided practice. The use of the name generator was faster for kahoot, a tip from last class from the other group. For the closure, the teachers asked students to list the causes and effects of global warming then asked secondary effects. The teachers could write down questions they had about the topic still and answer one question- 2 questions, simple and to the point. True and false was a good way to check their understanding, simple but not able to truly check the understanding of the students and questions need to be deeper. I like the use of an article, it is different but would have been helpful to have it on the board and read it off of there. I was unsure what many parts of the lesson were.
parts that need to be worked on. The teachers asked for what cause and effect is and the
students had to reply. Then described with examples. Asked what they already know about climate change. The teachers should have done expectations of the students beforehand. Next time visuals of each, in the beginning, would be nice, I like that you are using the board as something different but wasn't a fan of the use of the whiteboard. The students had to come up with 4-6 facts they knew about global warming. Wasn't sure if this was the development of not, was unclear. My suggestion is the group should have taught about global warming: explain, demonstrate, modeling and checking for understanding. The use of a whiteboard wasted some time and hard for students to read could have typed in while asking the questions. The students should of filled out the google forums, but I do understand that it was done this way to save time but could have done a different activity for this. you did this to not waste time. Kahoot was used as a guided practice. The use of the name generator was faster for kahoot, a tip from last class from the other group. For the closure, the teachers asked students to list the causes and effects of global warming then asked secondary effects. The teachers could write down questions they had about the topic still and answer one question- 2 questions, simple and to the point. True and false was a good way to check their understanding, simple but not able to truly check the understanding of the students and questions need to be deeper. I like the use of an article, it is different but would have been helpful to have it on the board and read it off of there. I was unsure what many parts of the lesson were.
No comments:
Post a Comment